Why Does the Media Hate (Poor) People Having Cheap Food?
For the Media: Awful News |
When things get more expensive – the poor get hammered hardest. But the media misses the obvious – the more government there is, the more things cost. It is axiomatic – in (at least) two ways.
One: Government needs money to do anything – and government doesn’t make any money. So it must take it from the private sector. Prices inexorably rise – to offset the money government just took.
Two: When government imposes regulations, the private sector has to waste time, money and energy complying with them. Which inflates prices in (at least) two ways. Compliance with government costs time and money – which raises prices. And that time and money could have been much better spent making their stuff better and cheaper – which prevents prospective price reductions.
So when we actually succeed in reducing some government – prices will of course fall. And when that happens – the media freak out. Because they don’t like the visual aide of the Less Government Model working. So they try to warp the good news – into bad news.
To wit: The European Union (EU) has just reduced a bit the government’s uber-involvement in sugar production. And as always happens when government shrinks – sugar prices will fall. Which means food prices will fall. Because sugar is in a LOT of food – not just desserts. Seriously, check the labels in your refrigerator and cupboards – and not just the sweet stuff. Sugar is a food staple.
So prices falling is good news for everyone – especially the poor. But for the Big Government media – not so much. Instead of heralding it, the media give us this inanity:
Europe could soon be swamped with cheap sugar – including fructose, which is blamed for fueling the US obesity epidemic – because of the planned liberalisation of the sugar market, experts have said….
Reforms set to be completed in 2017 will end the artificial barriers, which have enabled a handful of Europe’s sugar beet producers to dominate the market, supplying sucrose to food and soft drinks manufacturers.
They will lose the protection of the EU’s common agricultural policy, which has kept sugar prices high, blocked imports and imposed a production cap on fructose….
The market reforms take no account of their likely impact on health or their potential effect on those on the lowest incomes, according to Emilie Aguirre and colleagues from Cambridge University writing in the British Medical Journal….
How about we have billions of global individuals each make their own individual dietary decisions – and be able to make them with cheaper food as a part of the mix? And what about the billions of people around the world who can’t afford food – who will see this policy approach as a boon to, you know, not starving to death?
The media can’t stand for any of this sort of liberalized thinking. Their cacophony on this is, as always, of one note.
Agricultural Policy Reforms May Raise Sugar Intake, Harm Public Health
Liberalising Agricultural Policy for Sugar in Europe Risks Damaging Public Health
Reforms to Agricultural Policy May Increase Sugar Consumption and Harm Public Health
Reforms to Agricultural Policy May Increase Sugar Consumption and Harm Public Health
The joke, as always, is on us.
-----------------
Seton Motley is the President of Less Government and he contributes to ARRA News Service. Please feel free to follow him him on Twitter / Facebook.
Tags: Seton Motley, Less Government To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home