News Blog for social, fiscal & national security conservatives who believe in God, family & the USA. Upholding the rights granted by God & guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, traditional family values, "republican" principles / ideals, transparent & limited "smaller" government, free markets, lower taxes, due process of law, liberty & individual freedom. Content approval rests with the ARRA News Service Editor. Opinions are those of the authors. While varied positions are reported, beliefs & principles remain fixed. No revenue is generated for or by this "Blog" - no paid ads - no payments for articles.Fair Use Doctrine is posted & used. Blogger/Editor/Founder: Bill Smith, Ph.D. [aka: OzarkGuru & 2010 AFP National Blogger of the Year] Contact: editor@arranewsservice.com (Pub. Since July, 2006)Home PageFollow @arra
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato
(429-347 BC)
Bill Smith, Editor:Jill Stanek, Live Action, and The Daily Caller broke the following story that "Planned Parenthood and other U.S. abortion providers are willing to assist in the termination of baby girls for pregnant women who choose abortion because they want to have baby boys. And the pro-life abortion watchdog says its video series and a new website will expose it all."
From Live Action:
Chilling Undercover Video Sheds Light on Growing Trend AUSTIN, May 29 – Today, Live Action released a new undercover video showing a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in Austin, TX encouraging a woman to obtain a late-term abortion because she was purportedly carrying a girl and wanted to have a boy. The video is first in a new series titled “Gendercide: Sex-Selection in America,” exposing the practice of sex-selective abortion in the United States and how Planned Parenthood and the rest of the abortion industry facilitate the selective elimination of baby girls in the womb.
“I see that you’re saying that you want to terminate if it’s a girl, so are you just wanting to continue the pregnancy in the meantime?” a counselor named “Rebecca” offers the woman, who is purportedly still in her first trimester and cannot be certain about the gender. “The abortion covers you up until 23 weeks,” explains Rebecca, “and usually at 5 months is usually (sic) when they detect, you know, whether or not it’s a boy or a girl.” Doctors agree that the later in term a doctor performs an abortion, the greater the risk of complications.
The Planned Parenthood staffer suggests that the woman get on Medicaid in order to pay for an ultrasound to determine the gender of her baby, even though she plans to use the knowledge for an elective abortion. She also tells the woman to “just continue and try again” for the desired gender after aborting a girl, and adds, “Good luck, and I hope that you do get your boy.”
“The search-and-destroy targeting of baby girls through prenatal testing and abortion is a pandemic that is spreading across the globe,” notes Lila Rose, founder and president of Live Action. “Research proves that sex-selective abortion has now come to America. The abortion industry, led by Planned Parenthood, is a willing participant.”
Six studies in the past four years indicate that there are thousands of “missing girls” in the U.S., many from sex-selective abortion. The U.K., India, Australia, and other countries ban sex-selective abortion, but the U.S., save for three states, does not. On Wednesday, Congress will debate the Prenatal Non-Discrimination Act (PRENDA), which would ban sex-selective abortions nationally.
“Planned Parenthood and their ruthless abortion-first mentality is the real ‘war on women’,” says Rose. “Sex-selective abortion is gender discrimination with lethal consequences for little girls.”
The complete, unedited video and transcript can be viewed at ProtectOurGirls.com, a hub of research and information on sex-selective abortions.
For our readers, The video is presented below. It will may make you sick as you realize that the curse of mankind spoken in Genesis 11:1-9 is true and evil reigns in the form of intellect and choice: "then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them." Planned Parenthood supposedly helping women choose to kill future women (baby girls). This is the real "War on Women." China by fiat has done this and now the liberal actions of choice are doing the same thing. All government funding (federal or state) of planned parenthood and other abortion operators must cease.
Be it the killing boys or girls - Evil even reigns in the Bible belt of America. See for yourself:
Tags:planned parenthood, war on women, aborting girls, sex selection, killing babies To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
Someone asked my opinion on the strategy of banning sex-selection abortions (which are obviously horrible, and demonstrate the devious character of those who want them -- i.e. there's nothing wrong with hitting PP and others for wanting these), and this is what I said:
Well, I know there are strong feelings on both sides of this one. There are some highly respected pro-life figures who believe this is okay. And of course I don't question anyone's motives -- I'm sure the people who planned this are well meaning. But if you're banning abortions for purposes of sex-selection (so you wanted an abortion - why did you want it, was it for this reason, yes or no) this sets up a value differential between those babies who are being aborted for "normal" (translation, more understandable, less questionable) reasons versus those who are being aborted for purposes of selecting sex of the child. This reminds me of something Gov. Owens used to say when he was asked to make certain crimes have higher penalties if they were the result of a "hate crime" -- he said, "I always figured any murder was a hate crime." I understand the "heart tug" of this clever strategy, and I understand those who say you should try to place any obstacle you can in the way of the abortionists, but what I then ask is if it's worth accepting the enemy's premises -- do we believe that all abortions are wrong because every human baby has an equal Right to Life, or do we pass a law for well-meaning reasons that instead suggests some abortions are "more wrong" than others? I think we undermine our principles when we go along with any law that suggests the Right to Life is relative to circumstances. How's that? :)
Ed appreciate your comment. But did you mean by your statement, "There are some highly respected pro-life figures who believe this is okay." that you can name people who are pro-life who support aborting children based on choice of the baby's sex (gender). If so,I must ask for names. It is very doubtful they would be pro-life. If you meant something else, then I misunderstood.
Personal Tweets by the editor: Dr. Bill - OzarkGuru - @arra
#Christian Conservative; Retired USAF & Grad Professor. Constitution NRA ProLife schoolchoice fairtax - Editor ARRA NEWS SERVICE. THANKS FOR FOLLOWING!
To Exchange Links - Email: editor@arranewsservice.com!
Comments by contributing authors or other sources do not necessarily reflect the position the editor, other contributing authors, sources, readers, or commenters. No contributors, or editors are paid for articles, images, cartoons, etc. While having reported on and promoting principles & beleifs beliefs of other organizations, this blog/site is soley controlled and supported by the editor. This site/blog does not advertise for money or services nor does it solicit funding for its support.
Fair Use: This site/blog may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Per said section, the material on this site/blog is distributed without profit to readers to view for the expressed purpose of viewing the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. Any person/entity seeking to use copyrighted material shared on this site/blog for purposes that go beyond "fair use," must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Bill Smith, Editor: Jill Stanek, Live Action, and The Daily Caller broke the following story that "Planned Parenthood and other U.S. abortion providers are willing to assist in the termination of baby girls for pregnant women who choose abortion because they want to have baby boys. And the pro-life abortion watchdog says its video series and a new website will expose it all."
2 Comments:
Someone asked my opinion on the strategy of banning sex-selection abortions (which are obviously horrible, and demonstrate the devious character of those who want them -- i.e. there's nothing wrong with hitting PP and others for wanting these), and this is what I said:
Well, I know there are strong feelings on both sides of this one. There are some highly respected pro-life figures who believe this is okay. And of course I don't question anyone's motives -- I'm sure the people who planned this are well meaning. But if you're banning abortions for purposes of sex-selection (so you wanted an abortion - why did you want it, was it for this reason, yes or no) this sets up a value differential between those babies who are being aborted for "normal" (translation, more understandable, less questionable) reasons versus those who are being aborted for purposes of selecting sex of the child. This reminds me of something Gov. Owens used to say when he was asked to make certain crimes have higher penalties if they were the result of a "hate crime" -- he said, "I always figured any murder was a hate crime." I understand the "heart tug" of this clever strategy, and I understand those who say you should try to place any obstacle you can in the way of the abortionists, but what I then ask is if it's worth accepting the enemy's premises -- do we believe that all abortions are wrong because every human baby has an equal Right to Life, or do we pass a law for well-meaning reasons that instead suggests some abortions are "more wrong" than others? I think we undermine our principles when we go along with any law that suggests the Right to Life is relative to circumstances. How's that? :)
Ed appreciate your comment. But did you mean by your statement, "There are some highly respected pro-life figures who believe this is okay." that you can name people who are pro-life who support aborting children based on choice of the baby's sex (gender). If so,I must ask for names. It is very doubtful they would be pro-life. If you meant something else, then I misunderstood.
Post a Comment
<< Home