News Blog for social, fiscal & national security conservatives who believe in God, family & the USA. Upholding the rights granted by God & guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, traditional family values, "republican" principles / ideals, transparent & limited "smaller" government, free markets, lower taxes, due process of law, liberty & individual freedom. Content approval rests with the ARRA News Service Editor. Opinions are those of the authors. While varied positions are reported, beliefs & principles remain fixed. No revenue is generated for or by this "Blog" - no paid ads - no payments for articles.Fair Use Doctrine is posted & used. Blogger/Editor/Founder: Bill Smith, Ph.D. [aka: OzarkGuru & 2010 AFP National Blogger of the Year] Contact: editor@arranewsservice.com (Pub. Since July, 2006)Home PageFollow @arra
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato
(429-347 BC)
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
#Trainwreck: 'One of Most Famous' Pledges of Obama Presidency Is a Whopper & Gets Four Pinocchios
“[President Obama] went too far in his repeated pledge, which, after all, is one of the most famous statements of his presidency. The president’s promise apparently came with a very large caveat: ‘If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan — if we deem it to be adequate.’ … Four pinocchios.” (Washington Post Fact Checker)
“The president's original promise was so ironclad and repeated so often that any explanation now sounds like dissembling.” (Slate)
“…about half of the roughly 600,000 people in Kentucky's private insurance market will have their current insurance plans discontinued by the end of next year.” (CNN)
“…nearly one million Californians may see their health insurance plans disappear when the Affordable Care Act kicks in.” (KPIX)
“…those healthcare plans are often more expensive than the plans being cancelled.” (The Hill)
“‘You used to be able to choose what to get based on what you need and what you can afford, including a high deductible,’ DeLashmutt said. ‘Let me manage my own risk. Those people in Washington, D.C., shouldn't get to make that decision for me.’” (Reuters)
WATCH: “The $82 a month they paid for health coverage was doable. ‘My husband and I were getting perfectly fine coverage, we both have pre-existing conditions, we had the things covered that we needed covered.’ ... [now] ‘Our premium would be $497 a month, and that’s not exactly in our price range.’” (WEAR)
“Tom Luebchow, a 54-year-old small-business owner in Winston-Salem, N.C., received a letter from Blue Cross & Blue Shield of North Carolina telling him his individual health plan would be canceled and that the cost of coverage for his family would more than triple—to over $1,000 a month.” (Wall Street Journal)
“The Obama administration was given stark warnings just one month before launch that the federal healthcare site was not ready to go live…” (CNN)
“None of this is an accident. It is the deliberate result of the liberal demand that everyone have essentially the same coverage and that government must dictate what that coverage is and how much it costs.” (Wall Street Journal)
Tags:whopper, four pinocchios, train wreck, Obamacare, President Obama, pledge, To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
Personal Tweets by the editor: Dr. Bill - OzarkGuru - @arra
#Christian Conservative; Retired USAF & Grad Professor. Constitution NRA ProLife schoolchoice fairtax - Editor ARRA NEWS SERVICE. THANKS FOR FOLLOWING!
To Exchange Links - Email: editor@arranewsservice.com!
Comments by contributing authors or other sources do not necessarily reflect the position the editor, other contributing authors, sources, readers, or commenters. No contributors, or editors are paid for articles, images, cartoons, etc. While having reported on and promoting principles & beleifs beliefs of other organizations, this blog/site is soley controlled and supported by the editor. This site/blog does not advertise for money or services nor does it solicit funding for its support.
Fair Use: This site/blog may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Per said section, the material on this site/blog is distributed without profit to readers to view for the expressed purpose of viewing the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. Any person/entity seeking to use copyrighted material shared on this site/blog for purposes that go beyond "fair use," must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home