News Blog for social, fiscal & national security conservatives who believe in God, family & the USA. Upholding the rights granted by God & guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, traditional family values, "republican" principles / ideals, transparent & limited "smaller" government, free markets, lower taxes, due process of law, liberty & individual freedom. Content approval rests with the ARRA News Service Editor. Opinions are those of the authors. While varied positions are reported, beliefs & principles remain fixed. No revenue is generated for or by this "Blog" - no paid ads - no payments for articles.Fair Use Doctrine is posted & used. Blogger/Editor/Founder: Bill Smith, Ph.D. [aka: OzarkGuru & 2010 AFP National Blogger of the Year] Contact: editor@arranewsservice.com (Pub. Since July, 2006)Home PageFollow @arra
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato
(429-347 BC)
Congress Has Shown Bi-Partisan Support For A Long-Term Defense Program, Which President Obama Has Vowed To Veto
President Obama Says Our Military Needs ‘Long-Term Planning,’ Contradicts His Veto Threat
PRESIDENT OBAMA:“Part of what makes us a leader is when we govern effectively, and we keep our own house in order. And we pass budgets. And we can engage in long-term planning… And we can't just keep on kicking down the road without solving any problems or doing any long-term planning for the future. That's true for our military.”(President Obama, Press Conference, 10/2/15)
“New threats have emerged. New opportunities have appeared. We can't fund our country the way we did ten years ago because we have greater demands. With an aging population, with kids who need schools, with roads that need to be fixed, with a military on which we are placing extraordinary demands.” (President Obama, Press Conference, 10/2/15)
Yet, President Obama Wants To Veto Exactly That ‘Long-Term Planning’
“The House passed the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act Thursday, setting up a veto showdown with the Obama administration… President Obama has issued a veto threat against the bill, which senior administration officials warn he will follow through on. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said Wednesday he has already recommended that the president veto it.” (“House Passes Defense Authorization, Setting Up Veto Showdown,” The Hill, 10/1/15)
Q: “On the Hill yesterday, lawmakers reached a compromise on the annual defense authorization bill. And they have it so that it would use $90 billion believe from special war funds to avoid sequestration. Would the White House oppose this bill on the grounds that it would end sequestration for defense but not other programs?” JOSH EARNEST, White House Press Secretary: “…if the President got this bill he’d veto.”(White House Press Briefing, 9/30/15)
Strong Bipartisan Support For 2016 Defense Authorization Bill
“The House passed the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act Thursday, setting up a veto showdown with the Obama administration. The 270-156 vote comes after the House and Senate Armed Services committees reached agreement on a final conference report earlier this week.”(“House Passes Defense Authorization, Setting Up Veto Showdown,” The Hill, 10/1/15)
Tags:President Obama, Defense Veto threat, editorial cartoon, Joe HellerTo share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
Personal Tweets by the editor: Dr. Bill - OzarkGuru - @arra
#Christian Conservative; Retired USAF & Grad Professor. Constitution NRA ProLife schoolchoice fairtax - Editor ARRA NEWS SERVICE. THANKS FOR FOLLOWING!
To Exchange Links - Email: editor@arranewsservice.com!
Comments by contributing authors or other sources do not necessarily reflect the position the editor, other contributing authors, sources, readers, or commenters. No contributors, or editors are paid for articles, images, cartoons, etc. While having reported on and promoting principles & beleifs beliefs of other organizations, this blog/site is soley controlled and supported by the editor. This site/blog does not advertise for money or services nor does it solicit funding for its support.
Fair Use: This site/blog may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Per said section, the material on this site/blog is distributed without profit to readers to view for the expressed purpose of viewing the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. Any person/entity seeking to use copyrighted material shared on this site/blog for purposes that go beyond "fair use," must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home