ARRA News Service
ARRA News Service facebook page  
News for social, fiscal & national security conservatives who believe in God, family & the USA. Upholding the rights granted by God & guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, traditional family values, "republican" principles / ideals, transparent & limited "smaller" government, free markets, lower taxes, due process of law, liberty & individual freedom. All content approval rests with the ARRA News Service Editor. Opinions are those of the authors. While varied positions are reported, beliefs & principles remain fixed. No revenue is generated for or by this site - no paid ads accepted - no payments for articles. Fair Use doctrine is posted & used.
Editor/Founder: Bill Smith, Ph.D. [aka: OzarkGuru & 2010 AFP National Blogger of the Year]
Contact: editor@arranewsservice.com (Pub. Since July, 2006)
    Home Page

One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato (429-347 BC)

Monday, March 27, 2017

There Is No 60 Vote ‘Standard’ for Approval od SCOTUS Nominee

Washington Post Fact-Checker: Senate Democrats’ Are ‘Being Slippery With Their Language,’ ‘Misleading,’ There Is No 60 Vote ‘Standard’ For Supreme Court Nominees

Sen. Pat “Leahy … does not support Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s decision to filibuster the Gorsuch nomination, which would effectively block a full Senate vote. ‘I am not inclined to filibuster…’” (VTDigger, 3/27/17)

Other ‘Democrats Are Being Slippery With Their Language’

FactCheck.org: “A confirmation vote for a Supreme Court nominee requires only a simple majority, or 51 votes.” (“Sanders On SCOTUS Filibuster, Factcheck.org, 2/6/17)

The Washington Post’s Fact Checker: “Democrats are being slippery with their language. Sixty votes is not ‘a standard’ for Supreme Court confirmations, as two of the current justices on the court did not meet that supposed standard.” (“Senate Democrats’ Misleading Language On A 60-Vote ‘Standard’ For Supreme Court Nominees,” The Washington Post’s Fact Checker, 2/2/17)
“Two of the justices on the Supreme Court failed to meet a ‘standard’ claimed by Democrats.” (“Senate Democrats’ Misleading Language On A 60-Vote ‘Standard’ For Supreme Court Nominees,” The Washington Post’s Fact Checker, 2/2/17)
FALSE: ‘The Senate Must Insist Upon 60-Votes For Any Supreme Court Nominee’

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY) Yesterday: “Well, 60 votes should be the standard.” (ABC’s “This Week,” 3/26/17)
  • SCHUMER: “First, it's 60 votes, which we've required of every – it's called a filibuster, but it simply says you need 60 votes – I've always believed that's the right amount of votes… I was open-minded and waited for the hearings.” (WABC-NY, 3/26/17)
SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY) Before The Hearings: “The Senate must insist upon 60-votes for any Supreme Court nominee, a bar that was met by each of President Obama’s nominees.” (Sen. Schumer, Press Release, 1/31/17)
  • SCHUMER: “If this nominee cannot meet the same standard that Republicans insisted upon for President Obama’s Supreme Court nominees—60 votes in the Senate—then the problem lies not with the Senate but with the nominee… I am coming back to the floor to correct the record on my earlier comments, where I said Republicans ‘insisted’ on 60 votes for each of President Obama’s nominees. Sixty votes is a bar that was met by each of President Obama’s nominees…” (Sen. Schumer, Congressional Record, S.542 & S.545, 2/1/17)
SEN. DICK DURBIN (D-IL): “…Neil Gorsuch. He should have a hearing and he should meet the voting standard that Supreme Court nominees are held to of 60 votes. A standard that was met by Elena Kagan as well as Sonya Sotomayor, President Obama's choices.” (MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” 2/1/2017)

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS (I-VT) Is Just Plain Confused: “Requiring 60 votes in the Senate to confirm Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court is not a filibuster, Bernie Sanders argued Sunday ahead of a Democratic effort to block President Trump's nominee to the high court. ‘It's not a question of filibustering,’ Sanders said on CNN's State of the Union. … In fact, the vote that Sanders referred to, which requires 60 votes in Senate rules, is not a vote on confirmation but rather a vote to limit debate, which wouldn't be necessary if Democrats didn't threaten to filibuster. In the past, when Republicans were in the minority, Sanders has called requiring that 60-vote threshold a filibuster, even if no actual talking filibuster took place.” (“Sanders: Requiring 60 Votes For Gorsuch Is Not A Filibuster,” Washington Examiner, 3/26/17)

FACT: Neither Sonia Sotomayor Nor Elena Kagan Required Any Sort Of ‘60-Vote’ Threshold

No Democrats now serving in the Senate have EVER insisted that a Democrat President’s SCOTUS nominee meet a 60-vote standard.

FactCheck.org: “…that was not the case for the two Supreme Court justices nominated by Obama and approved by the Senate. Both were confirmed in the 111th Congress, when the Democrats controlled the Senate: Sonia Sotomayor on Aug. 6, 2009, and Elena Kagan on Aug. 5, 2010.” (“Sanders On SCOTUS Filibuster, Factcheck.org, 2/6/2017)

The nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States did NOT require 60 votes. (PN506 Sonia Sotomayor, Roll Call Vote #262, 8/6/2009)
  • “Mr. REID: Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that tomorrow, Thursday, August 6, at 10 a.m., the Senate proceed to executive session to resume consideration of Executive Calendar No. 309, the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and that the time until 2 p.m. be divided equally in alternating 1-hour blocks with the Republicans controlling the first hour; that at 2 p.m. the time be divided 15 minutes each as follows: Senator SESSIONS, Senator LEAHY, Senator MCCONNELL and Senator REID, in that order; that at 3 p.m., without further intervening action or debate, the Senate proceed to vote on confirmation of the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor; that upon confirmation, the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table, no further motions be in order, the President be immediately notified of the Senate’s action, and the Senate then resume legislative session. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.” (U.S. Senate, Congressional Record, S.8887, 8/5/2009)
The nomination of Elena Kagan to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States did NOT require 60 votes. (PN1768 Elena Kagan, Roll Call Vote #229, 8/25/2010)
    Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays on the nomination of Elena Kagan to be an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second? There is a sufficient second. The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the nomination of Elena Kagan, of Massachusetts, to be an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court? The clerk will call the roll. The legislative clerk called the roll.” (U.S. Senate, Congressional Record, S.6830, 8/5/2010)

    Tags: US Supreme Court, nominee, confirmation No 60 vote standard To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
    Posted by Bill Smith at 2:06 PM - Post Link

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home


    National Debt
    Don't miss anything!
    Subscribe to the
    ARRA News Service
    It's FREE & No Ads!

    You will receive a verification email
    & must validate you subscribed!

    You Then Receive One Email Each AM
    With Prior Days Articles / Toons / More


    Also, Join us at:
    Facebook.com/ARRANewsService


    Recent Posts:
    Personal Tweets by the editor:
    Dr. Bill - OzarkGuru - @arra
    #Christian Conservative; Retired USAF & Grad Professor. Constitution NRA ProLife schoolchoice fairtax - Editor ARRA NEWS SERVICE. THANKS FOR FOLLOWING!

    Action Links!
    Arkansas State Senators
    AR State Representatives
    Arkansas Governor Office
    Arkansas Attorney General
    Bankrupting America
    US House of Representatives
    US Senators
    Family Research Council
    GrassFire
    NumbersUSA
    Ballotpedia
    Judgepedia
    Sunshine Review

    Facebook Accts - Dr. Bill Smith
    Pages:
    ARRA News Service
    Arkansans Against Big Government
    Alley-White Am. Legion #52
    Catholics & Protestants United Against Discrimination
    End Taxpayer Funding of NPR
    Overturn Roe V. Wade
    Prolife Soldiers
    Project Wildfire 4 Life
    Republican Liberty Caucus of Arkansas
    The Gold Standard
    US Atty Gen Loretta Lynch, aka Eric Holder, Must Go
    Veterans for Sarah Palin
    Why Vote for Hillary (Satire)
    FB Groups:
    Arkansas For Sarah Palin
    Arkansas Conservative Caucus
    Arkansas County Tea Party
    Arkansans' Discussion Group on National Issues
    Blogs for Borders
    Conservative Solutions
    Conservative Voices
    Defend Marriage -- Arkansas
    FairTax
    FairTax Nation
    Arkansas for FairTax
    Friends of the TEA Party in Arkansas
    Freedom Roundtable
    Let's Mine AR Lignite NOW!
    Pro-Life Rocks - Arkansas
    Republican Network
    Republican Liberty Caucus of AR
    Reject the U.N.

    Patriots
    Exchange
    Links

    Request Via
    Article Comment

    Links to ARRA News
    A Patriotic Nurse
    Agora Associates
    a12iggymom's Blog
    America, You Asked For It!
    Americans for a Free Republic
    America's Best Choice
    America's Whatchtower
    An Ol’ Broad’s Ramblings
    ARRA Twitter
    As A Matter of Fact
    As The Crackerhead Crumbles
    Baaad Media!
    Black & Right
    Blogs For Borders
    Blogs for Palin
    Blow the Trumpet Ministry
    Boot Berryism
    Cap'n Bob & the Damsel
    Chicago Ray Report
    Chuck Baldwin - links
    Citizen Pamphleteer
    Common Cents
    Conservative Hideout
    Conservative Observer AZ
    Conservative Voices
    Conway Real Deal
    Defeat Obama's Agenda
    Diana's Corner
    eGOP News
    Florida Pundit
    Franklin Online Outreach
    Freedom For US Now
    Free Zone Media Center
    For God and Liberty
    Garland County Republicans
    Greater Fitchburg For Life
    Guns and Religion
    Lasting Liberty Blog
    Liberal Isn't Amy
    Liberty's Lifeline
    Maggie's Notebook
    Marathon Pundit
    Monkey in the Middle
    NASA Satellites
    No Runny Eggs
    Okie Campaigns
    Our Voices Arkansas
    Patriot's Corner
    ProLifeBlogs
    Publius Forum
    Randy's Roundtable
    Real Debate Wisconsin
    Religion and Morality
    Right on Issues that Matter
    Right Reason
    Rocking on the Right Side
    Saber Point
    Saline Watchdog
    Secure Arkansas
    Sentry Journal
    Sultan Knish
    Teresamerica
    Stop Obama Satire & Cartoons
    The Arkansas Patriot
    The Audacity of Logic
    The Blue Eye View
    The Bobo Files
    The Born Again Americans
    TEA Party Cartoons
    The Conservative Citizen
    The Foxhole | Unapologetic Patriot
    The Liberty Republican
    The Lid
    The Looking Spoon
    The Maritime Sentry
    The O Word
    The Path to Tyranny Blog
    The Real Polichick
    The War on Guns
    TOTUS
    Truth About Obamacare
    Twitter @ARRA
    Warning Signs
    Women's Prayer & Action
    WyBlog

    Editor's Managed Twitter Accounts
    Twitter Dr. Bill Smith @arra
    Twitter Arkansas @GOPNetwork
    Twitter @BootBerryism
    Twitter @SovereignAllies
    Twitter @FairTaxNation

    Editor's Recommended Orgs
    Accuracy in Media (AIM)
    American Committment
    American Culture & Faith Institute
    American Enterprise Institute
    American Family Business Institute
    Americans for Limited Government
    Americans for Prosperity
    Americans for Tax Reform
    American Security Council Fdn
    AR Faith & Ethics Council
    Arkansas Policy Foundation
    Ayn Rand Institute
    Bill of Rights Institute
    Campaign for Working Families
    Center for Individual Freedom
    Center for Immigration Studies
    Center for Just Society
    Center for Freedom & Prosperity
    Citizens Against Gov't Waste
    Citizens in Charge Foundstion
    Coalition for the Future American Worker
    Competitive Enterprise Institute
    Concerned Veterans for America
    Concerned Women for America
    Declaration of Am. Renewal
    Eagle Forum
    FairTax
    Family Research Council
    Family Security Matters
    Franklin Center for Gov't & Public Integrity
    Freedom Works
    Gingrich Productions
    Global Incident Map
    Great Americans
    Gold Standard 2012 Project
    Gun Owners of America (GOA)
    Heritage Action for America
    David Horowitz Freedom Center
    Institute For Justice
    Institute for Truth in Accounting
    Intercollegiate Studies Institute
    Judicial Watch
    Less Government
    Media Reseach Center
    National Center for Policy Analysis
    National Right To Work Foundation
    National Rifle Association (NRA)
    National Rifle Association (NRA-ILA)
    News Busters
    O'Bluejacket's Patriotic Flicks
    OathKeepers
    Open Secrets
    Presidential Prayer Team
    Religious Freedom Coalition
    Renew America
    Ron Paul Institute
    State Policy Network
    Tax Foundation
    Tax Policy Center
    The Club for Growth
    The Federalist
    The Gold Standard Now
    The Heritage Foundation
    The Leadership Institute
    Union Facts



    Blogs For Borders

    Reject the United Nations

    Adopt Our Troops in Prayer


    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

    FairTax Nation on FaceBook
    Friends of Israel - Stand with Israel
    Blog Feeds
    Syndicated - Get the ARRA News Service feed Syndicated!
    ARRA Blog Feed

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to The Free Dictionary

    Powered by Blogger


    • How To Exchange Links!
    • Comments by contributing authors or other sources do not necessarily reflect the position the editor, other contributing authors, sources, readers, or commenters. No contributors, or editors are paid for articles, images, cartoons, etc. While having reported on and promoting the beliefs associated with the ARRA, this blog/site is not controlled by nor funded by the ARRA. This site/blog does not advertise for money or services nor does it solicit funding for its support.
    • Fair Use: This site/blog may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Per said section, the material on this site/blog is distributed without profit to readers to view for the expressed purpose of viewing the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. Any person/entity seeking to use copyrighted material shared on this site/blog for purposes that go beyond "fair use," must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
    • © 2006 - 2017 ARRA News Service
    Creative Commons License
    Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.