Ford's Accusation against Kavanaugh Is Not Credible
 |
| Christine Blasey Ford |
Now the Dems and the media say any claim of sexual misconduct, no matter how remote and unreliable, is enough to destroy the life of Brett Kavanaugh because they are afraid he will cast a vote to overrule Roe v. Wade.
Christine Blasey Ford sent a letter dated July 30, 2018 to Dianne Feinstein stating that in the early 1980s, she was at a "gathering" at a home in suburban Maryland with four others. Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge, both drunk, forced her into a room and locked the door, and Kavanaugh then got on top of her. Judge also "periodically" jumped on top of both. Kavanaugh put a hand over her mouth and she believed he would "inadvertently" kill her. At one point, Judge jumped on both again, and she took this "opportune" moment to run outside and go home.
Ford reported this incident to her "local government representative" on July 6, 2018.
Ford wrote to Feinstein to provide "relevant information regarding the current nominee" to the Supreme Court.
It is important to read the actual letter to see how unreliable it is:
Senator Dianne Feinstein
Dear Senator Feinstein;
I am writing with information relevant in evaluating the current nominee to the Supreme Court. As a constituent, I expect that you will maintain this as confidential until we have further opportunity to speak. Brett Kavanaugh physically and sexually assaulted me during high school in the early 1980's. He conducted these acts with the assistance of REDACTED. Both were one to two years older than me and students at a local private school.
The assault occurred in a suburban Maryland area home at a gathering that included me and four others. Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stair well [sic] from the living room. They locked the door and played loud music precluding any successful attempt to yell for help. Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with REDACTED, who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh. They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state. With Kavanaugh's hand over my mouth I feared he may inadvertently kill me. From across the room a very drunken REDACTED said mixed words to Kavanaugh ranging from "go for it" to "stop."
At one point when REDACTED jumped onto the bed the weight on me was substantial. The pile toppled, and the two scrapped with each other. After a few attempts to get away, I was able to take this opportune moment to get up and run across to a hallway bathroom. I locked the bathroom door behind me. Both loudly stumbled down the stair well at which point other persons at the house were talking with them. I exited the bathroom, ran outside of the house and went home. I have not knowingly seen Kavanaugh since the assault. I did see REDACTED once at the REDACTED where he was extremely uncomfortable seeing me.
I have received medical treatment regarding the assault. On July 6 I notified my local government representative to ask them [sic] how to proceed with sharing this information. It is upsetting to discuss sexual assault and its repercussions, yet I felt guilty and compelled as a citizen about the idea of not saying anything.
I am available to speak further should you wish to discuss. I am currently REDACTED and will be in REDACTED.
In confidence, REDACTED.
First, why, if this happened, didn't this 15-year-old girl immediately tell her parents that she was attacked and then report to the police? The police could then have questioned everyone at the "gathering." She says she thought Kavanaugh would inadvertently kill her, yet she does not report this to her parents and the police? This isn't credible. According to the Post, her explanation is as follows:
Her parents would not believe her because she didn't look as though someone had attacked her? What parents will not believe their 15-year-old daughter who runs home to tell them drunken boys tried to rape her?
Second, Kavanaugh has been investigated by the FBI for appointments to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, White House counsel, and other federal jobs. Why didn't Ford call the FBI so the FBI could investigate Kavanaugh?
Third, Mark Judge has denied the accusation.
Fourth, according to her husband, the motivation for telling the therapist in 2012 was that Kavanaugh might be appointed to the Supreme Court. This shows political motivation: she does not want Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, although she did not care that he was on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Fifth, why write to a "local government representative" on July 6, 2018 and then Feinstein on July 30, 2018 instead of contacting the FBI? The "local" Democrat and Feinstein should have immediately referred this to the FBI for investigation. Feinstein should have immediately shared the letter with the entire Judiciary Committee so members could question Kavanaugh. Instead, Feinstein played a political game to wait for an ambush.
Sixth, note the odd language in the letter. She was at a "gathering," not a party. She contacted her "local Democratic representative" to find out how to proceed. She is a college professor, yet she acts as though she doesn't know to call the FBI. She says she received "medical treatment" "for the assault," but aside from one couples therapy session in 2012, there is no mention of any other treatment.
Seventh, Ford said there were four boys at the "gathering." Her attorney, Debra Katz, now says there was a girl present.
Ford's letter of July 30 and her therapy notes of 2012 show her motivation and provide much material for a vigorous cross-examination if this were a case handled by real attorneys.
Unfortunately, we have weak Republicans who will be afraid to ask Ford tough questions for fear of backlash and bad press from the swamp. The Dems will give speeches attacking Kavanaugh and Trump. Kavanaugh will testify with candor and credibility that he did not attack Ford. There is no pattern or other accusations, as with Bill Clinton and others.
We do not know if Ford will appear on Monday, September 24 to testify under oath and answer questions on cross-exam. The latest is that Ford wants the FBI to investigate before she testifies. The bottom line is that Ford and the Dems and the media want to delay the vote and hope Kavanaugh withdraws.
Ford and the Dems and the media know that her story will not hold up.
-------------------
J. Marsolo shared this article in the American Thinker
Tags: J. Marsolo, Christine Blasey Ford, Accusation, against Kavanaugh, Not Credible, American Thinker To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
Posted by Bill Smith at 4:00 PM - Post Link
1 Comments:
Here's what we know about Christine Blasey Ford, the left-wing activist and lying political democrat pawn that Diane Feinstein is using to stop Brett Kavanaugh from being confirmed to the Supreme Court.
FACTS:
1. She's been silent about this "incident" for 36 years.
2. She didn't tell anyone when it happened.
3. She didn't tell her parents.
4. She didn't call the Police or file a police report.
5. She didn't tell her teachers.
6. She didn't tell her best friends.
7. She didn't seek any help.
8. She can't remember where "it' happened, or the state "it' happened in.
9. She can't remember whose house she was in or how she got to the house.
10. She can't remember how she left the house..
11. She can't remember the names of anyone at the party.
12. She suddenly remembers an assault in 2012--vaguely.
13. She tells that therapist in 2012 that 4 boys assaulted her.
14. She changes the number to 2 boys in 2018.
15. She doesn't tell the therapist any of their names.
16. She has no evidence that she ever even knew Kavanaugh.
17. She has no evidence he was ever at a party.
18. She has no evidence she ever spoke with him.
19. She has no eyewitnesses, except Mark Judge, she claims.
17. She is "absolutely nuts", says Mark Judge.
18. She is represented by left-wing activist lawyer who opposes Brett Kavanaugh and Donald Trump..AND is Vice Chair of George Soros 'Stop Kavanaugh' organiztion. A mere coincidence.
Seriously. There is zero evidence, zero proof, zero witnesses, and zero credibility. An unknown incident, at an unknown location, involving unknown people, on an unknown date.
But now she sends a letter to Diane Feinstein, who is so concerned about the contents of this letter that she does NOTHING with it for 2 1/2 months since receiving it.
She doesn't question Kavanaugh about it in their private meeting. She doesn't question him during the confirmation hearings. She doesn't give it to the FBI for review when she gets it. She doesn't tell the GOP about its existence. Until 3 days before the confirmation vote.
This is the worst 11th Hour, Hail Mary, Attempt to Snatch Victory From the Jaws of Defeat that the DemonRats have ever attempted.
Post a Comment
<< Home