News Blog for social, fiscal & national security conservatives who believe in God, family & the USA. Upholding the rights granted by God & guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, traditional family values, "republican" principles / ideals, transparent & limited "smaller" government, free markets, lower taxes, due process of law, liberty & individual freedom. Content approval rests with the ARRA News Service Editor. Opinions are those of the authors. While varied positions are reported, beliefs & principles remain fixed. No revenue is generated for or by this "Blog" - no paid ads - no payments for articles.Fair Use Doctrine is posted & used. Blogger/Editor/Founder: Bill Smith, Ph.D. [aka: OzarkGuru & 2010 AFP National Blogger of the Year] Contact: editor@arranewsservice.com (Pub. Since July, 2006)Home PageFollow @arra
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato
(429-347 BC)
Monday, July 02, 2007
Sales Tax relief on food takes effect in Arkansas
by JohnAnderson, The Baxter Bulletin: Taxes don't come down as often as they go up, so customers couldn't help but smile when they talked about the three-percentage-point reduction in Arkansas' sales tax on groceries that took effect Sunday. "I guess, to a certain extent, any savings is a good thing," Stephanie Morris of Mountain Home said as she finished shopping . . . But with prices creeping up for some groceries, confounding laws on how the tax reduction is applied and a high level of skepticism on government, they'll have to be forgiven for not dancing. "It should be good," Mountain Home area resident Bob Recktenwald said, "if the grocery stores don't mark up their profits." State legislators this year responded to Gov. Mike Beebe's proposal to gradually phase out the sales tax on groceries by passing a bill that halves the state's portion of the grocery tax. Any further reductions would require another act of the legislature and are unlikely before it meets again in 2009. "It's not going to mean that much until they do away with the whole thing. Then you'll see some real savings," Recktenwald said.
. . . Beebe said last week that he still wants to push next year for a further reduction in the tax and wants to eventually eliminate it, except for a 1/8-cent sales tax for conservation that was approved by voters in 1996. He said the timing was right for the tax relief, due to the state's financial health. Arkansas in the 2006-07 fiscal year was on target to have a surplus approaching $1 billion.[Read More] ARRA Comment: again the surplus was close to $1 Billion. Remember, Gov. Beebe was forced during his campaign to acknowledge the need to reduce food tax because of the campaign plank of Asa Hutchinson and the embarrassment over the excessive surplus. However, once taking office the legislators bought his position to "phase out" the food tax. The operative missing word now for the future is "maybe." Beebe and the Democrat state leadership wants to spend and obligate the surplus; they do not want to return it to the people - or it would be done. They are going to drag out the time another two years and then "maybe" they will phase it out. It is time to end the tax on groceries! Tags:Arkansas, food tax, sales tax
Personal Tweets by the editor: Dr. Bill - OzarkGuru - @arra
#Christian Conservative; Retired USAF & Grad Professor. Constitution NRA ProLife schoolchoice fairtax - Editor ARRA NEWS SERVICE. THANKS FOR FOLLOWING!
To Exchange Links - Email: editor@arranewsservice.com!
Comments by contributing authors or other sources do not necessarily reflect the position the editor, other contributing authors, sources, readers, or commenters. No contributors, or editors are paid for articles, images, cartoons, etc. While having reported on and promoting principles & beleifs beliefs of other organizations, this blog/site is soley controlled and supported by the editor. This site/blog does not advertise for money or services nor does it solicit funding for its support.
Fair Use: This site/blog may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Per said section, the material on this site/blog is distributed without profit to readers to view for the expressed purpose of viewing the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. Any person/entity seeking to use copyrighted material shared on this site/blog for purposes that go beyond "fair use," must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home