News Blog for social, fiscal & national security conservatives who believe in God, family & the USA. Upholding the rights granted by God & guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, traditional family values, "republican" principles / ideals, transparent & limited "smaller" government, free markets, lower taxes, due process of law, liberty & individual freedom. Content approval rests with the ARRA News Service Editor. Opinions are those of the authors. While varied positions are reported, beliefs & principles remain fixed. No revenue is generated for or by this "Blog" - no paid ads - no payments for articles.Fair Use Doctrine is posted & used. Blogger/Editor/Founder: Bill Smith, Ph.D. [aka: OzarkGuru & 2010 AFP National Blogger of the Year] Contact: editor@arranewsservice.com (Pub. Since July, 2006)Home PageFollow @arra
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato
(429-347 BC)
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Farm Subsidies Going To The Wealthy including Rep.Marion Berry?
$20B In Tax Dollars Is Allocated To Keep Farms Afloat - And Some Lawmakers Are Benefitingby Sharyl Attkinson (CBS News):Each year, taxpayers fork over about $20 billion in farm subsidies to help keep America's farms up and running. But over the years, more and more of the payments have gone to Fortune 500 companies, the wealthy - and even members of Congress, CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports. Ken Cook, who researches the issue, says it makes about as much sense as putting a milk bucket under a bull. “The big farms get most of the money. Ten percent of the beneficiaries get over 70 percent of the payments . . .
Even the members of Congress who vote on farm subsidies and earn $165,200 government salaries can get payments. A dozen of them or their close family have gotten a total of $6.2 million dollars over 10 years. One of them is Arkansas Rep. Marion Berry. He's grown rice his whole life, and has collected subsidies from the start. Today, he and his family members have interests in several farm corporations. Attkisson asked him: “You and your family’s interests received almost $2.4 million in federal payments from 1999 to 2005 according to records?" Berry said: “I don’t have any idea. That sounds like an awful lot of money to me.” Whatever the amount, most Americans would hardly envision Berry as the disadvantaged farmer. “Can you tell me what your net worth is?” Attkisson asked. “My net worth? I don’t have any idea,” Barry replied. “Well, it’s not very much I know.” "This range says $1.7 million to $6.6 million,” Attkisson read to him. “That’s probably pretty close,” Berry said.
The new farm bill working its way through Congress attempts to cut off some of the wealthy. Under one version, no one earning more than $1 million a year could get subsidies. That wouldn't affect Berry. He's worth a lot, but says his yearly income falls below the million-dollar mark. There's nothing illegal or improper about the wealthy receiving farm subsidies. Cook says it's just not fair to taxpayers . . . [Read More]Tags:Arkansas, CBS, Congressional Pork, farm subsidies, Marion Berry, US CongressTo share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
Personal Tweets by the editor: Dr. Bill - OzarkGuru - @arra
#Christian Conservative; Retired USAF & Grad Professor. Constitution NRA ProLife schoolchoice fairtax - Editor ARRA NEWS SERVICE. THANKS FOR FOLLOWING!
To Exchange Links - Email: editor@arranewsservice.com!
Comments by contributing authors or other sources do not necessarily reflect the position the editor, other contributing authors, sources, readers, or commenters. No contributors, or editors are paid for articles, images, cartoons, etc. While having reported on and promoting principles & beleifs beliefs of other organizations, this blog/site is soley controlled and supported by the editor. This site/blog does not advertise for money or services nor does it solicit funding for its support.
Fair Use: This site/blog may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Per said section, the material on this site/blog is distributed without profit to readers to view for the expressed purpose of viewing the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. Any person/entity seeking to use copyrighted material shared on this site/blog for purposes that go beyond "fair use," must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home