"Mr. Brown's" Brown Shirts - The Brown Bailout
by Carter Clews, Americans For Limited Government: I have decided to write an open letter to the Democrat members of Congress. And I'm sharing it with you, dear reader, since it helps illustrate anew why Mark Twain called Congress "America's only truly criminal class."
Now, let me forewarn you that what follows may seem a trifle simplistic. But, please bear in mind that I have to make this as easy as possible for the august members of the United States Congress - since simple logic is obviously not their forte. (Else wise, how would they figure that the best way to get the country out of debt is to triple the federal deficit?) So, I have tried to put all of this in terms even a politician can understand:
FedEx calls it a "bailout" (brownbailout.com). I call it a sell-out - because Mr. Brown's Brown Shirts are preparing to sell your birthright of freedom for their pot of political porridge. Feel free to drop them the above letter if you get the urge. Maybe they might even listen.
Tags: Americans for Limited Government, bailout, congress, FedEx, union bailouts, UPS To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
Now, let me forewarn you that what follows may seem a trifle simplistic. But, please bear in mind that I have to make this as easy as possible for the august members of the United States Congress - since simple logic is obviously not their forte. (Else wise, how would they figure that the best way to get the country out of debt is to triple the federal deficit?) So, I have tried to put all of this in terms even a politician can understand:
Dear Guys and Gals,That's a pretty ugly story, isn't it, dear reader? And it's made all the uglier because it is absolutely 100% true. The United States Congress, in its continuing assault upon free enterprise, is preparing to dismantle FedEx at the behest of the UPS contributors and Teamster Union bosses.
Remember the movie, "Planes, Trains, and Automobiles"? Starred the late, large John Candy and the always delightful Steve Martin. Well, in that movie, John and Steve (I'll call them by their real names, since throwing in their movie names at this point would only tend to confuse you), flew on an airplane, rode on a train, and rented an automobile. Hence, the name of the movie. Get it? No? Well, you can discuss it later at a town meeting.
For now, here's what I want you to do . . . First of all, forget about the trains part - because what I'm about to go over with you has nothing to do with trains. I know, I know, we all like trains - and you have a special expertise with them, since you're the ones who bankrupted Amtrak. But, try to stay with me.
Now what I want you to do is imagine a car with a big box on the back. And let's call this a truck. Okay? You with me? You've probably seen trucks roll past you on the highway when you're being driven around in your chauffeur-driven limousines. They often have UPS written on them.
Next, I want you to think about those things that fly through the air with wings on them that you use to sneak out of town when your lobbyist friends take you on all-expense-paid political junkets (I'm sorry, I meant "fact-finding missions"). They're called "planes."
Trucks roll down the road. Planes fly through the air. I'll pause here while you repeat that a couple of times until it starts to sink in . . .
Got it yet? Well, good - because if you do, there's a question I'd like to ask you: Why in god's name would you even consider passing a pay-to-play bill sponsored by a crook named Rep. James L. Oberstar (D-MN) that would gut the FedEx air delivery system by treating its fleet of airplanes like they were a bunch of trucks?
Could it be because each of you - like the greedy, grasping James Oberstar - is up to your ears in political pay-offs (sorry, make that "campaign contributions") from FedEx's main competitor, United Parcel Service? And because you're also on the political payroll of the bare-knuckled bosses over at the Teamsters Union -- which has been trying unsuccessfully for years to unionize FedEx?
Please, don't deny it - that would only add insult to injury. According to Bloomberg news, UPS has "given more money to federal lawmakers than any other company over two decades." And Teamster Union bosses have made a habit of handing Democrats tens of millions of dollars in hard and soft contributions in election after election for decades on end.
Let's face it, you know exactly what Oberstar did - and why he did it. Carrying water for UPS and the Teamsters, he sneaked 230 words into the voluminous (I know that's a long word: it means "big") FAA Reauthorization Act that would gut FedEx. His 230-word poison pill would remove FedEx from the Railway Labor Act, under which it has operated since the day it was founded, and suddenly stick it under a law (the National Labor Relations Act) never intended for the type of air transportation FedEx uses to deliver 85 percent of its packages.
And - more importantly to you, James Oberstar, and your paymasters at United Parcel Service and the Teamsters Union - it would force FedEx to unionize and end its competition with UPS (which, not so coincidentally, delivers 85 percent of its packages by truck and does rightly fall under the NLRA).
In short, you have become little more than Mr. Brown's Brown Shirts. And that is nothing less than shameful.
So, here's what I want you to do if you have one ounce of decency left (and, please, write this down, or ask one of your factotum aides to remind you): Strip the Oberstar pay-to-play poison pill language from the FAA Reauthorization Act in the Senate. And, then, just for good measure, make sure that hack Oberstar doesn't try to stick it back in when the bill goes back to the House. It might help you sleep better at night. Or, if not, at least it will for the rest of us.
Once you're done all of that, you can get back to bankrupting the nation, which I know is your favorite thing to do anyway.
Sincerely,
Carter Clews
FedEx calls it a "bailout" (brownbailout.com). I call it a sell-out - because Mr. Brown's Brown Shirts are preparing to sell your birthright of freedom for their pot of political porridge. Feel free to drop them the above letter if you get the urge. Maybe they might even listen.
Tags: Americans for Limited Government, bailout, congress, FedEx, union bailouts, UPS To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
5 Comments:
Are you kidding me?
UPS has Planes
FedEx has Planes
UPS has delivery vehicles
FedEx has delivery vehicles
UPS has tractor trailers
FedEx has tractor trailers
In fact, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say FedEx has MORE drivers than pilots.
FedEx has to grow up sometime and stop with the childish assaults on 1 of the premier corporations of all time.
Joe,
Stop drinking the Teamsters' Kool-aide.
To quote you with a slight modification, "It is time for 'UPS' to grow up sometime and stop with the childish assaults on 1 of the premier corporations of all time." It time to stop trying to get Congress to write in protectionism for UPS. Or maybe it is the union that is running UPS these days.
The point made by the post was the expansion of government into the private sector and using the government to benefit ones business over their competitors.
The unions are interfering!
UPS has Teamsters Union - who supports taking away a workers right to a secret vote.
FedEx does not Teamsters Union.
UPS funds / has James L. Oberstar (D-MN)
FedEx does not fund or have James L. Oberstar (D-MN)
UPS has "given more money to federal lawmakers than any other company over two decades:
FedEx is behind UPS in graft giving and doesn't have the Teamsters funding Congressmen for them.
UPS has higher union labor costs and lower profits.
FedEx has no union and higher profit.
Do I agree with UPS trying to gain an advantage through legislation -NO.
Do I still like UPS - YES.
However both UPS and FedEx deliver to my door. Since I believe in the free market place, I may ship opt to exclusively by FedEx if legislation or transportation rules are modified to give UPS a special advantage.
It is disgusting to watch people lie for their own personal agenda.
Hey, if you don’t like unions, that’s fine, but none of what is stated is true about the Fedex/UPS situation.
Fedex has been given an advantage all these years by making their drivers “independent contractors”, limiting employees rights and benefits, and now UPS is legally lobbying for Fedex drivers to be considered drivers, as they should, but all these sites pop up saying that removing an unfair advantage that Fedex had all these years, is giving UPS an unfair advantage.
You even said it yourself; both UPS and Fedex deliver to your door. Then why should FedEx’s drivers be classified differently, though they both “deliver to your door”.
UPS is the ninth largest airline in the world and they deliver nearly as many express packages daily as Fed-X. Fed-X has been the company with the bailout for years. Fed-X is the only package carrier in the country that enjoys their current status. If Fed-X employees are truly happy then what is Fred Smith so worried about. You can hardly blame UPS and other carrier's to want a level playing field. Fed-X has enjoyed the hiding behind the labor act created for airlines. The Fed-X bailout must stop.
Fed-X and UPS both have planes, trucks, sorters, loaders, drivers etc, How can anyone say they are different and should be treated differently.
All I know is, if I actually want the package here on time, I go with FedEx. I get a lot of stuff from both carriers and FedEx consistently strikes me as the more efficient operation. If employment at FedEx is really such an onerous arrangement for their drivers they can vote with their feet and take their services elsewhere. Look at what the union did to GM.
Post a Comment
<< Home