Obama New Plan: Use The Buffet Rule: "Screw America"
 |
| Obama-Buffet Hypocrisy! Buffet Hasn't Paid Taxes Since 2002 So, Mr. Obama "Gave" Warren Buffet The Medal of Freedom |
Senate reconvenes at 2 PM today and begin a period of morning business. At 4:30, the Senate will begin consideration of H.R. 2832, the Generalized System of Preferences Act, a trade promotion bill expected to be the vehicle for renewing Trade Adjustment Assistance. At 5:30 PM, the Senate will vote on cloture on the motion to proceed on the bill.
Speaking in the Rose Garden this morning, President Obama unveiled his new fiscal plan, but like his latest stimulus bill, it’s been met with mostly skepticism and criticism so far. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell summed it up: “Veto threats, a massive tax hike, phantom savings, and punting on entitlement reform is not a recipe for economic or job growth—or even meaningful deficit reduction. The good news is that the Joint Committee is taking this issue far more seriously than the White House.” Newsweek’s Jon Meacham was even more succinct, saying on MSNBC, “I just think it’s a big, big mess and the President has given up the chance now to lead effectively on this stuff . . . .”
News outlets previewed the speech by pointing out its decidedly political tint. Politico writes, “Suffering an erosion of support from the broad coalition that elected him, Obama has crafted a plan that reads more like a blueprint for shoring up his restless Democratic base than a vehicle for reaching across the aisle in search of bipartisan compromise.” The Washington Post notes, “Coming as a congressional supercommittee goes to work to find budget savings this fall, Obama’s position will probably delight Democrats, who have fretted for months that he is doing too little to solve the nation’s jobs crisis while being too willing to embrace major changes to Medicare and Social Security. But his plan has little chance of passing and is already inflaming Republicans, who have vowed to oppose new taxes and have called for deep cuts in federal spending and entitlements.” And MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski mused this morning, “I think this is about the next election. Someone is going to have to explain to me why it’s not.”
On the substance, The Wall Street Journal writes, “Mr. Obama’s plan, which will be offered to the lawmakers charged with negotiating a deal by Nov. 23, will include roughly $1.5 trillion in tax increases primarily on wealthy Americans and corporations, people familiar with the proposal said. . . . The roughly $1.5 trillion in tax increases that Mr. Obama is expected to propose would include the expiration in 2013 of the Bush-era tax cuts for families making more than $250,000 a year. Mr. Obama will also include a set of tax increases he put forward last week to pay for his $447 billion jobs bill: limiting itemized deductions for families with taxable income of $250,000 or more a year, and ending tax breaks for oil companies, corporate-jet owners and investment-fund managers.”
In another story, the WSJ observes, “President Barack Obama’s proposal to raise taxes on some millionaires will likely please members of his party, but it is unlikely to have much practical impact on federal deficits anytime soon.” However, Reuter's reports that Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) jumped on the Obama band wagon quickly concerning the "Buffett Rule." He said,"Let's grab the language, get it scored; let's put it on the floor and let's have a vote." However, ABC’s Jonathan Karl pointed out yesterday, “It’s not new, by the way, he proposed a millionaires tax to finance healthcare and it went nowhere. This is not a new idea.”
Appearing on “Meet The Press” yesterday, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell told NBC’s David Gregory, “I would simply go back to what the President said last December in signing a two-year extension of the current tax rates: it’s [raising taxes] a bad thing to do in the middle of an economic downturn. And of course the economy, some would argue, is even worse now than it was when the President signed the extension of the current tax rates back in December. I think what he said then still applies now.”
Reacting to the president’s so-called “Warren Buffett tax” idea, Leader McConnell said,“[I]f Warren Buffett would like to give up some of his benefits we’d be happy to talk about it. I mean, I think that means testing benefits is one of the ways that we’re going to have to solve at least this Social Security and Medicare problems long-term for the next generations. With regard to his tax rate, if he’s feeling guilty about it, I think he should send in a check. But, we don’t want to stagnate this economy by raising taxes.”
CD News said: "The Buffett Rule proves to be nothing more than the ultimate case of hypocritical tax dodgers becoming Obama spokesmen telling working Americans to pay more taxes, as in Billionaire tax dodging hypocrite Mr. Warren Buffett, who is currently involved in an almost a decade-long battle to……NOT PAY HIS FAIR SHARE of TAXES. That’s right, Warren Buffett is not up to date in paying his fair share of taxes, but this hypocrite can join Barack Obama in telling everyone else to pay more taxes."
Tags: Barack Obama, Warren Buffet, TaX, Hypocrisy, Washington, D.C., US. Senate, To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
Posted by Bill Smith at 1:36 PM - Post Link
5 Comments:
Bend over baby CAUSE HERE IT COMES!!!
What else do you expect?
Can you believe he received that award?
Responding to President Obama continued audacious threatening and class-warfare oriented tirades, NRCC Chairman, Rep. Pete Sessions (R, TX-32), in an email identified that "Despite voters roundly rejecting his failed agenda, President Obama... has the audacity to threaten to veto any plan aimed at fixing our budget crisis that does not include his demand for a new $1.5 trillion tax increase. President Obama is aiming to outdo his own record in a race for failed policies." Sessions further said, "Our economy is sputtering and the last thing we need is to take $1.5 trillion away from hardworking Americans and put it in the hands of the government. Threatening is not governing. Their policies have failed, but the President and Democrats have shown, once and for all, they have no interest in changing their ways or listening to the American people.
iberals on Monday cheered President Barack Obama’s plan to hike taxes on the wealthy to cut the deficit. But the response from Democrats on the front lines of 2012 election battles? Silence. Or, at best, tepid enthusiasm. Centrist Democrat...s, a dwindling breed on Capitol Hill, were quickly faced with another rough choice once Obama went public with his plans: Reject their president or back what Republicans are already calling the largest tax increase in the nation’s history.
Post a Comment
<< Home