News Blog for social, fiscal & national security conservatives who believe in God, family & the USA. Upholding the rights granted by God & guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, traditional family values, "republican" principles / ideals, transparent & limited "smaller" government, free markets, lower taxes, due process of law, liberty & individual freedom. Content approval rests with the ARRA News Service Editor. Opinions are those of the authors. While varied positions are reported, beliefs & principles remain fixed. No revenue is generated for or by this "Blog" - no paid ads - no payments for articles.Fair Use Doctrine is posted & used. Blogger/Editor/Founder: Bill Smith, Ph.D. [aka: OzarkGuru & 2010 AFP National Blogger of the Year] Contact: editor@arranewsservice.com (Pub. Since July, 2006)Home PageFollow @arra
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato
(429-347 BC)
Thursday, November 21, 2013
‘We’re Not Touching Judges’
Senate Democrats Once Opposed Using The Nuclear Option To Pack The Courts
July ‘13 – Dems Promised ‘We're Not Touching Judges’
QUESTION: “In 2005, you said that changing these rules would be a black chapter in the history of the country. It would ruin our country and that you should not be able to willy-nilly change the rules of the Senate. Isn't this being a little hypocritical about changing the rules now?” SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV): “...I -- I wasn't talking about changing the rules for nominees. I was talking about changing the rules for judges. OK?”(Sen. Reid, Remarks At The Center For American Progress Action Fund, 7/15/13)
SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV):“We’re not touching judges. That's what they were talking about. This is not judges.” (NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 7/14/13)
SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV):“We're not talking about changing the filibuster rules that relates to nominations for judges. …this is not about judges.” (NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 7/14/13)
SEN. SHERROD BROWN (D-OH): “…I think any president should have the ability to put people in place for the -- at the pleasure of the president. These are not judges. That's a whole another issue.”(MSNBC, 7/9/13)
SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR (D-MN): “…I don't understand why for these nominees, I'm not talking about judges here, I'm talking about the president's team, of which there are currently over 180 people that are just pending right now before the Senate for the Executive Office nominations. Why we can't just do 51 votes is beyond me.” (ABC’s “This Week,” 7/14/13)
Dems Called It ‘An Outrageous Abuse Of Power’
SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV):“…the so-called nuclear option… attempt to rewrite Senate rules so we would be another House of Representatives; that we would throw away the Constitution of the United States so the Federal courts could be packed.”(Sen. Reid, Congressional Record, S.8911, 9/5/06)
REID:“We stand united against an outrageous abuse of power that would pack the courts with out-of-the-mainstream judges.”(Sen. Reid, Congressional Record, S.5198, 5/16/05)
SEN. PAT LEAHY (D-VT):“…on the brink of a terrible moment in the United States Senate when the majority leader would break the rules to change the rules in order to achieve the President's goal of packing the courts.” (Sen. Leahy, Congressional Record, S.6288, 6/9/05)
LEAHY: “The American people deserve better than what we have seen with the destruction of rule after rule by a majority willing to sacrifice the role of the Senate as a check and balance in order to aid a President determined to pack the Federal courts. It is the courts themselves that serve as the check on the political branches. Their independence is critical and must be preserved.” (Sen. Leahy, Congressional Record, S.5387, 5/18/05)
SEN. DICK DURBIN (D-IL): “Sadly, they have many allies in high places--allies in the Senate who are willing to break the rules of the Senate to change the rules of the Senate … pack the Federal courts with judges more of their liking, judges who are not activist by their definition. Today their allies in the Senate are willing to use the nuclear option to destroy the filibuster and to really destroy our system of checks and balances.” (Sen. Durbin, Congressional Record, S.5288, 5/17/05)
SEN. PATTY MURRAY (D-WA): “By stripping the Senate of its constitutional role, we are seeing theeffort to pack the courts with radical judges, push an extreme agenda, and leave millions of Americans behind.”(Sen. Murray, Congressional Record, S.5420, 5/18/05)
SEN. JACK REED (D-RI): “It is important that we do not let another President try to pack the courts. The Senate cannot become merely a rubberstamp for any President. The independence of the courts is critical to protecting the Constitution and the rights of individuals.” (Sen. Reed, Congressional Record, S.4468, 4/28/05)
SEN. BARBARA BOXER (D-CA): “We are not going to do this. We are not going to see a packing of the courts. We are going to preserve the filibuster.”(Sen. Boxer, Congressional Record, S.6198, 6/8/05) Tags:Democrat, U.S. Senators, History, we're not touching judges, 2005,To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
Taking the Progressive establishment on the both left and right into consideration with Thursday's events, we are in trouble. What a horrible day for liberty.
Personal Tweets by the editor: Dr. Bill - OzarkGuru - @arra
#Christian Conservative; Retired USAF & Grad Professor. Constitution NRA ProLife schoolchoice fairtax - Editor ARRA NEWS SERVICE. THANKS FOR FOLLOWING!
To Exchange Links - Email: editor@arranewsservice.com!
Comments by contributing authors or other sources do not necessarily reflect the position the editor, other contributing authors, sources, readers, or commenters. No contributors, or editors are paid for articles, images, cartoons, etc. While having reported on and promoting principles & beleifs beliefs of other organizations, this blog/site is soley controlled and supported by the editor. This site/blog does not advertise for money or services nor does it solicit funding for its support.
Fair Use: This site/blog may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Per said section, the material on this site/blog is distributed without profit to readers to view for the expressed purpose of viewing the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. Any person/entity seeking to use copyrighted material shared on this site/blog for purposes that go beyond "fair use," must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
1 Comments:
Taking the Progressive establishment on the both left and right into consideration with Thursday's events, we are in trouble. What a horrible day for liberty.
Post a Comment
<< Home