Reviewing South Carolina Results
by Gary Bauer, Contributing Author: Results: South Carolina
It is hard to find weaknesses in the sweeping victory Donald Trump scored in South Carolina Saturday night. He won virtually every demographic, all but two counties and all 50 delegates. Here are the results:Trump 33%
Rubio 23%
Cruz 22%
Bush 8%
Kasich 8%
Carson 7%. Exit polls indicated that there are various categories of the Republican vote that Trump essentially owns. For example:
Nevada Republicans vote tomorrow, where Donald Trump holds a 16-point lead according to the latest poll.
Reflections On Money
There are many campaign postmortems out there that are depressing to read. By some accounts, Jeb Bush raised roughly $180 million. Unconfirmed reports suggest a top Bush consultant may have been paid as much as $14 million for his colossal failure.
Reading these reports brought to mind the millions donated to Karl Rove in 2012. No matter what they did, they just couldn't turn Mitt Romney into a winning candidate. The same argument made for Romney -- he's the only one who can win -- was made for Jeb. It ended up being a complete misreading of the mood of the public.
I remember a large donor in 2012 who said to me, "I'll support your super PAC, but I want to know you're following the lead of Karl Rove in spending your money." I refused to follow Rove's lead, and I didn't get the donation.
All of which is to say that we could win a lot more victories if we stopped listening to the establishment's analysis of the kind of people we should nominate and what we should run on. The professional consulting class is demonstrating an uncanny (and expensive) ability to get it wrong!
Evangelicals & Trump
Seventy-two percent of Republican voters Saturday identified as born-again evangelical Christians. They split 33% for Trump, 27% for Cruz and 22% for Rubio.
There is a lot of angst about how an electorate that was so overwhelmingly evangelical could give a plurality of its votes to Donald Trump when his views on values issues are at best murky. I have a theory.
For years many pro-family leaders have been warning the Republican Party that there are a lot of voters out there who vote for Republican candidates solely on issues like the sanctity of life, the meaning of marriage and the general sense that Republicans stand for social conservatism.
We have warned party elites that if those issues are off the table, a lot of these folks will vote based on other issues, such as their perception of their own economic interests. That could lead them to vote for Democrats or populist candidates.
Just consider two main issues for values voters -- abortion and the meaning of marriage -- and where we stand today. After 40 years of voting for pro-life candidates, we are beginning to make some progress. But we have yet to fully restore rights to the unborn, and we are fighting over whether taxpayers should be forced to pay for abortions.
On marriage, social conservatives did everything they were asked to do. We were told that a federal marriage amendment was a bridge too far, and that marriage was a state issue. So, more than 30 states voted to protect the definition of traditional marriage. But then the federal courts invalidated their votes.
When the Supreme Court ruled that marriage only between a man and a woman was unconstitutional, there was little pushback from Republican leaders in Washington. Some quarters of the party actually seemed relieved that the court had "settled" the issue, even though it was settled in a manner contrary to the values of most Republican voters.
So what does this have to do with South Carolina? Well, if you are an evangelical blue collar worker and you conclude that no major political force is going to fight for your social values, you start voting based on other issues, if you vote at all.
Did Donald Trump win a plurality of evangelical votes? Yes he did. They were overwhelmingly blue collar evangelicals who chose him for his opposition to illegal immigration, his opposition to trade deals, which they perceive as trading away their jobs, his economic populism and his full-throated "America First" nationalism.
Several conservative media outlets this morning, including the increasingly influential Breitbart.com, are suggesting that what is happening now may be a blue collar takeover of the Republican Party.
-------------
Gary Bauer is a conservative family values advocate and serves as president of American Values and chairman of the Campaign for Working Families
Tags: Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families, South Carolina, results, reflections on money, Evangelicals & Trump To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
It is hard to find weaknesses in the sweeping victory Donald Trump scored in South Carolina Saturday night. He won virtually every demographic, all but two counties and all 50 delegates. Here are the results:
Rubio 23%
Cruz 22%
Bush 8%
Kasich 8%
Carson 7%.
- 40% of Republican primary voters said they were angry with big government, and they voted for Trump by 20 points.
- 44% of primary voters said illegal immigrants should be deported. They voted for Trump by 23 points.
- 48% of primary voters said they wanted a candidate from outside the political establishment. They voted for Trump by 50 points.
Nevada Republicans vote tomorrow, where Donald Trump holds a 16-point lead according to the latest poll.
Reflections On Money
There are many campaign postmortems out there that are depressing to read. By some accounts, Jeb Bush raised roughly $180 million. Unconfirmed reports suggest a top Bush consultant may have been paid as much as $14 million for his colossal failure.
Reading these reports brought to mind the millions donated to Karl Rove in 2012. No matter what they did, they just couldn't turn Mitt Romney into a winning candidate. The same argument made for Romney -- he's the only one who can win -- was made for Jeb. It ended up being a complete misreading of the mood of the public.
I remember a large donor in 2012 who said to me, "I'll support your super PAC, but I want to know you're following the lead of Karl Rove in spending your money." I refused to follow Rove's lead, and I didn't get the donation.
All of which is to say that we could win a lot more victories if we stopped listening to the establishment's analysis of the kind of people we should nominate and what we should run on. The professional consulting class is demonstrating an uncanny (and expensive) ability to get it wrong!
Evangelicals & Trump
Seventy-two percent of Republican voters Saturday identified as born-again evangelical Christians. They split 33% for Trump, 27% for Cruz and 22% for Rubio.
There is a lot of angst about how an electorate that was so overwhelmingly evangelical could give a plurality of its votes to Donald Trump when his views on values issues are at best murky. I have a theory.
For years many pro-family leaders have been warning the Republican Party that there are a lot of voters out there who vote for Republican candidates solely on issues like the sanctity of life, the meaning of marriage and the general sense that Republicans stand for social conservatism.
We have warned party elites that if those issues are off the table, a lot of these folks will vote based on other issues, such as their perception of their own economic interests. That could lead them to vote for Democrats or populist candidates.
Just consider two main issues for values voters -- abortion and the meaning of marriage -- and where we stand today. After 40 years of voting for pro-life candidates, we are beginning to make some progress. But we have yet to fully restore rights to the unborn, and we are fighting over whether taxpayers should be forced to pay for abortions.
On marriage, social conservatives did everything they were asked to do. We were told that a federal marriage amendment was a bridge too far, and that marriage was a state issue. So, more than 30 states voted to protect the definition of traditional marriage. But then the federal courts invalidated their votes.
When the Supreme Court ruled that marriage only between a man and a woman was unconstitutional, there was little pushback from Republican leaders in Washington. Some quarters of the party actually seemed relieved that the court had "settled" the issue, even though it was settled in a manner contrary to the values of most Republican voters.
So what does this have to do with South Carolina? Well, if you are an evangelical blue collar worker and you conclude that no major political force is going to fight for your social values, you start voting based on other issues, if you vote at all.
Did Donald Trump win a plurality of evangelical votes? Yes he did. They were overwhelmingly blue collar evangelicals who chose him for his opposition to illegal immigration, his opposition to trade deals, which they perceive as trading away their jobs, his economic populism and his full-throated "America First" nationalism.
Several conservative media outlets this morning, including the increasingly influential Breitbart.com, are suggesting that what is happening now may be a blue collar takeover of the Republican Party.
-------------
Gary Bauer is a conservative family values advocate and serves as president of American Values and chairman of the Campaign for Working Families
Tags: Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families, South Carolina, results, reflections on money, Evangelicals & Trump To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home