Today, US Senate Republicans
agreed to a ban on earmarks proposed by Sen. Jim DeMint (S.C.). The Republican Conference by voice vote called on Democrats to adopt a voluntary ban moments. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) called on Democrats to swear off requests for “Congressionally directed spending item, limited tax benefit or limited tariff benefit” during the 112th Congress (the next two years). The House Republican leadership who will control Congress in January had already signaled to the Senate earlier that they would ban earmarks in the during the 112th Congress.
Curtis Coleman answers the following important questions
An Earmark Primer: A simple summary of a complex conundrum - and a solution:
- What are earmarks?
- How do they work?
- Are they good?
- Are they bad?
- Are they constitutional?
- Do they increase our national debt?
- Do they cause corruption in government?
- Is there a solution?
Curtis Coleman is President of The Curtis Coleman Institute for Constitutional Policy, headquartered in North Little Rock, Arkansas and a contributor to the ARRA News Service.
Tags: earmarks, earmark ban, US Congress, earmark primer, review, answered questions, solution, Curtis Coleman, Institute for Constitutional Policy To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated by the editor! Supporting and opposing comments are welcome. Language deemed to be a questionable or offensive or "gutter language" by the editorial staff will not be displayed. Comments that are beyond a few paragraphs and are in fact "essays" are edited or not posted. Comments advertising products and services, any "xxx material or links" or which are blatant attacks by Liberals are not posted. We do post comments as determined by the editor from other sites, services and social media which share our articles, article links, or use our feed.